Legal Opinion

Abeles v. Friedman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This is a motion for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the picketing of, and other interference with, the business of the plaintiffs by the defendants, who are unions. There is a cross-motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it appears upon its face that a labor dispute is involved within the meaning of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act and that there has been no compliance with the requirements of that section. The plaintiffs concede that they have failed to comply with the provisions of the section referred to but contend there is no labor controversy here involved.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Thompson v. BoekhoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Sainer v. Affiliated Dress Manufacturers Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greenstein v. National Skirt & Sportswear Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Jou-Jou Designs, Inc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local 23-25Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. R.M. Perlman, Inc. v. New York Coat, Suit, Dresses, Rainwear & Allied Workers' Union Local 89-22-1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Larry Jay, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Parke, Davis & Co. v. Amalgamated Health & Drug Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API