Legal Opinion

Randall v. Dusenbury

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to punish defendant, as for a contempt, for not obeying a judgment requiring the payment of money.

1Opinion of the CourtSanford, J.

— By a judgment of this court, rendered at special term, on the 8th day of June, 1874, it was adjudged that the plaintiff recover of Charles Dusenbury, trustee under assignment from Selah Hiler, $3,134.41, debt or damages, together with $276.33 costs, and amounting altogether to $3,410.73.

It was further adjudged that said Dusenbury, trustee as aforesaid, defendant, do forthwith pay said sum of $3,410.73 out of a certain fund received by him under the said assignment, and prior to all other payments from said fund. It was further adjudged that the plaintiff have leave to apply to this court,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lansing v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. . ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Harris v. ElliottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Pittsfield National Bank v. BayneNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API