Legal Opinion

California Electric Power Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 16, 1950No. 7888-BHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, District Judge.

This is an action to recover the sum of $4,549.51, alleged to have been erroneously exacted from the plaintiff, under Section 1802(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 U.S.C.A., prior to the amendment of 1947, as a documentary stamp tax upon a certain issue of stock by plaintiff. The question for decision is whether the entire issue or only a part thereof of plaintiff’s new preferred stock constituted an original issue within the meaning of Section 1802 (a). The facts were stipulated and are substantially as follows:

Prior to the time of the recapitalization in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Oil Co. v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. United States v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. American Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. BerlinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. BerlinerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. California Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API