Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Policastro v. Savarese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1991Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLawrence, J.

concurs in part and dissents in part, and votes to grant the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove a new trial, with the following memorandum: I concur with my colleagues with regard to all the issues raised on these appeals, except the claims with regard to the liability of the defendant Incorporated Village of Lake Grove.

As noted by the majority, the general claim against the Village was that it had failed to maintain in a safe condition Stony Brook Road and Pond Path. There was extensive testimony presented by both lay and expert witnesses with regard to three theories of liability against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. County of OneidaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Cumbo v. ValenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Wirth v. De VitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API