Legal Opinion

Jezierny v. Jezierny

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 9, 2007No. AC 27008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Peter Jeziemy, appeals from the judgment of the trial court reducing his weekly alimony payment to the plaintiff, Linda Jeziemy, from $275 to $160. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly determined that the plaintiff was entitled to continue receiving alimony. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On December 23, 1998, the court dissolved the parties’ marriage and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff weekly alimony of $275. The defendant filed a postjudgment motion for modification of alimony on July 8, 2005, claiming that he had retired from…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aquarion Water Co. v. Beck Law Products & Forms, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Forastiere v. HigbieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Rasey v. BergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dubaldo Electric, LLC v. Montagno Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. 73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Park City Sports, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Park City Sports, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API