Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center Industries

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1979No. 48627Published

1DissentOtis, Justice

This is another of a series of cases where the majority of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals rejects the report of an attending physician and adopts the views of an expert, hired by the employee’s lawyer for purposes of litigation, who first examined the employee a year and four months after she permanently left her job.

It is undisputed this employee’s initial back problem was a degenerative narrowing of the disc space in the lower spine and she suffered from a combination of disabilities unrelated to her work. She was in 1975 58 years of age, 5-foot-3V2 inches in height, and weighed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Fisher v. RED & WHITE TAXI COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Mansfield v. Gopher Aviation CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API