Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Hunterbrook Building Corp., Whitehill Building Corp., Mohansic Building Corp. And 300 Building Corp., Debtors-Appellants. Richard P. Schulz, Petitioning Creditors-Appellants. Ardisco, Ltd., and New Jersey Industries, Inc., Answering Creditors-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 23, 1960No. 25952_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
276 F.2d 190
In the Matter of HUNTERBROOK BUILDING CORP., Whitehill
Building Corp., Mohansic Building Corp. and 300
Building Corp., Debtors-Appellants.
Richard P. Schulz et al., Petitioning Creditors-Appellants.
Ardisco, Ltd., and New Jersey Industries, Inc., Answering
Creditors-Appellees.
No. 222 Docket 25952.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 3, 1960.
Decided March 23, 1960.
Joseph R. Pisani, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Gaynor, Mosher, Freeman & Pisani. New Rochelle, on the brief), for petitioning creditors-appellants.
Irving Like, Babylon, N.Y. (Reilly & Like, Babylon, N.Y., on the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Manati Sugar Co. v. MockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Arey & Russell Lumber Co., Inc. v. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. Of Danville, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Mokava Corporation v. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- In re Blinrig Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- In re Hunterbrook Building Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960