Legal Opinion

Meinhard v. Millstein

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 18, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtAduerman, J.

A proceeding has now been instituted in “ Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment ” upon a judgment obtained in the Municipal Court on March 10, 1922. Motion was made to vacate the proceedings upon the ground that the judgment was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The motion was granted *890and the judgment creditor moves for reargument, contending that since the enactment of sections 773-810 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1935, chap. 630) the statute covering examinations in supplementary proceedings is now entitled “ Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment ” as distinguished from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Importers & Traders' National Bank v. QuackenbushNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Conyngham v. . DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Mede v. MeyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API