Legal Opinion

Binford v. Penney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 24, 1950No. 6 Div. 31PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

This case deals with a situation where removal of a coexecutor is sought on the ground in effect that after his appointment he filed a bill in his individual capacity to contest the second codicil of the will. The case comes to this court on appeal by Caryl Penney Binford, a devisee and legatee under the will of J. E. Penney, deceased, from the order of the equity court sustaining demurrers to and dismissing a petition filed by her in that court seeking to remove Paul M. Penney (appellee) as the coexecutor of the will of J. E. Penney, deceased.

J. E. Penney died testate on May…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henderson v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Riley v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Randle v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  4. Gaither v. GaitherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  5. Castleberry v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Fuller v. NazalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Galin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Whatley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API