Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Harden
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The only question presented by this appeal is: Is there evidence of a substantial nature sufficient to support the jury’s verdict?
Appellee, L. M. Harden, on April 7, 1938, filed complaint in the Phillips circuit- court iii which he alleged that as he drove upon appellant’s track at a regular crossing in the city of Marianna, Arkansas, the automobile which he was driving was struck by one of appellant’s trains, resulting in damages to his car and injuries to himself; that before driving on the crossing 'he brought his car to a full stop within fifteen or twenty feet of the track, looked in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fort Smith & Western Railway Co. v. MessekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PrinceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Arkansas Central Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crossett Lumber Company v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- McGlothin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Missouri Pac. R. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941