Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kurtz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided November 25, 1969No. 9PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, J.,

George Kurtz was tried before a jury and found guilty of malicious use of telephone, a misdemeanor. The only evidence at the trial was that produced by the Commonwealth, and it is now before the court en banc for review on defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.

In passing upon such motion, the evidence must be read in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, and it is entitled to all reasonable inferences arising therefrom. Moreover, in passing upon such a motion, all evidence actually received must be considered, whether the trial rulings thereon were right or wrong:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KravitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Fauceglia v. HarrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Panama Canal Co. v. Stockard & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HolowkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API