Legal Opinion

Harrelson v. Flowers

Richmond City Circuit Court

Decided May 12, 1970Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge A. Christian Compton

Enclosed you will find a copy of the judgment order entered today in favor of the defendant Flowers.

As indicated to counsel following the hearing of the evidence in this case, the court has found the following facts: that the relationship existing between the plaintiff and the defendant Bohannan was that of a gratuitous bailment; that the negligent act resulting in damage to the plaintiff’s vehicle was not a grossly negligent act; and that the defendant Flowers at the time of the incident was the servant of Bohannan acting within the scope of his employment.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dawson v. Fusco's Auto Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API