Commonwealth v. Wilds

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant raises five contentions in this appeal from his March 25, 1975 conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. 1 He argues that the evidence was insufficient, that he was entitled to a jury charge on the lesser offense of possession of less than thirty grams, 2 that the trial judge made prejudicial comments during his summary of the evidence, that the court below should have suppressed evidence seized pursuant to a defective search warrant affidavit, and that the court erred in admitting evidence of criminal conduct which was…