Hinkley v. Art Students' League of New York
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McDOWELL, District Judge.
Tbe opin-
ion of the trial court has been published. See Art Students’ League of New York v. Hinkley (D. C.) 31 F.(2d) 469. The appellants are the trustees appointed by the will of Edward G. McDowell, tbe daughter of said testator, and the guardian ad litem of tbe only child of tbe daughter.
We fully concur in the conclusion of tbe trial court to tbe effect that the will of Edward McDowell, tbe son, made a valid disposition of what may be conveniently termed the son’s half of tbe property. And we think it unnecessary to diseuss any question treated in tbe admirable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ball v. TompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1890
- Shelby v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Smith Middlings Purifier Co. v. McGroartySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Webster v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
- American National Bank of Beaumont v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Loats Female Orphan Asylum v. EssomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Lederer v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.