Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fitzsimmons v. Federal Shipbuilding Dry Dock Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 16, 1949Published

1Dissent

Despite my great respect for the opinion of my colleagues, I do not agree with the result reached in this case.

I think the court below erred in awarding compensation to petitioner-respondent as a total dependent. At the time of decedent's accident the Workmen's Compensation Act provided,R.S. 34:15-13: "In case of death, compensation shall be computed, but not distributed, on the following basis:

"a. For one dependent, thirty-five per cent. of wages.
"b. For two dependents, forty per cent. of wages.
"g. The term `dependents' shall apply to and include any or all of the following who are dependent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  2. Schmid v. Stanton Forging Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. Comparri v. James Readding, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Alexander v. Cunningham Roofing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  5. Alexander v. Cunningham Roofing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API