Legal Opinion

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Silbergeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph P. Kuszynski, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 brought by the defendants, Abraham R. Kushner and Molly Silbergeld, as executors of the estate of Rose Silbergeld, deceased, on the ground that, with *286respect to the estate, the plaintiff’s cause of action is without merit. The facts are as follows:

On December 13, 1963 a contract between Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and a partnership known as H. Silbergeld and composed of Arthur Silbergeld and his mother, Bose Silbergeld, now deceased, was executed. The contract provided that the partnership would demolish and salvage an obsolete…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slater v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. In re the Accounting of HuttonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gorger v. GorgerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Traeger v. Sapir (In Re Danenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API