McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Woulph
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Marshall county., Hon J. O. Andrews, Judge. ’ , , Claim and delivery by the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company against John R. Woulph. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The faqts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
So far as this appeal relates to an order made after judgment on the hearing of a motion for a new trial, but never entered, the same will be disregarded, and the case considered not otherwise than an appeal from the judgment alone, presenting only alleged errors of law occurring at the trial, including the direction of a verdict upon the undisputed evidence Threshing Machine Co. v. Skau, 10 S. D. 636, 75 N. W. 199; Haggarty v. Strong, 10, S. D. 585, 74 N. W. 1037; Jones v. Faris, 6 S. D. 112, 60 N. W. 403.
At the trial of the action which is claim and delivery; tore-cover the possession of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Welles v. . YatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Day v. . DaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Goodenow v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Higgins v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- De Peyster v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- MacGregor v. PierceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Korrick v. TullerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Fotheringham v. LockhartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- McCarthy v. SpeedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.