State v. Dameron
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the Court’s refusal to continue the case or to exclude the testimony of challenged witnesses. The record discloses that on 22 November 1971 on motion of the defendant the Court entered an order in pertinent part as follows:
“It is Ordered that the State furnish to the defendant the following information:
3. The names and all statements to be used by the State of North Carolina in the trial of the above listed cases *86which were made by any witnesses concerning the crime alleged against the various defendants.
7. Counsel for the accused shall be permitted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. PhillipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975