Legal Opinion

State v. Hescock

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 1999No. 22572-7-IIPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Armstrong, A.C.J.

Ryan Hescock was charged in juvenile court with one count of forgery. Although the State charged Hescock with two alternative means of committing forgery in violation of RCW 9A.60.020(1)(a) and RCW 9A.60.020(1)(b), the trial court found Hescock guilty of violating only RCW 9A.60.020(1)(a). On appeal, Hescock argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction under alternative (1)(a) and that double jeopardy prevents a remand for the trial court to consider whether he is guilty under alternative (1)(b). We agree and accordingly reverse and dismiss Hescock’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. McCrevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. CarlinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. State of Iowa v. Jeffrey John MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API