Legal Opinion

Myerhoff v. Tinslar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1912No. Gen. No. 5,590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on the case. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. Charles B. Campbell, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action on the case for deceit, brought on December 21, 1909, in the Circuit Court of Kankakee county, by Charles H. Myerhoff, of Evansville, Indiana, against F. S. Tinslar, Bobert W. Wilkinson, B. F. Myers, William B. Fleager, F. L. Munroe and George W. Eastburn. Service was not had on East-burn and he did not appear or defend. There was a trial and a verdict finding the defendants guilty and assessing plaintiff’s damages at $7,475.80; a motion for a new trial was overruled; and all the defendants except Eastburn…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hronek v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Miller v. JohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gardner v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Dawson v. BridgesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  5. Miller v. JohnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barry v. LeglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Stauber v. StauberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  3. Hough v. Commercial Wheat Growers Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API