State ex rel. Langlois v. Lancaster

In their application for rehearing, respondents contend that we erred in four particulars in rendering our opinion:

“1. The Court erred in holding that evidence of petitioners’ prior service as councilmen of the Town of New Roads for the term preceding the election of January 3, 1949, was inadmissible under the pleadings and that the Court could not consider the findings of fact of the Supreme Court on that point;

“2. The Court erred in holding that the finding of the Supreme Court that petitioners were councilmen of the Town of New Roads at the.time of and prior to the election of January 3,…