Legal Opinion

Black v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 9, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01775Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ROXANNE B., No. 3:20-cv-01775-HZ Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Roxanne B.’s counsel seeks attorney fees in the amount of $6,905.08 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The Commissioner does not oppose the request or raise the issue of substantial justification. But the Commissioner objects to the amount of the request, arguing that it is unreasonable based on the facts of this case. The Court grants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Costa v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Atkins v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API