Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Turner v. Hendryx

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1917Published

From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. On motion to dismiss appeal.. Department 1.

1ConcurrenceJustice Harris

delivered the following specially concurring opinion:

I cannot concur with all that is said by Mr. Justice Benson, although I agree with the conclusion that the judgment should be reversed. There is no bill of exceptions in the record; and in my opinion the absence of a bill of exceptions not only precludes us from trying the cause de novo but also prevents us from reexamining any disputed c_ ’estion of fact, if the decision of such- disputed question of fact is dependent upon the evidence offered at the trial. Among the files is a transcript of the testimony certified to by the official court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sutherlin v. BloomerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Barnes v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. SengstackenOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Farrell v. Oregon Gold Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Livesley v. LitchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API