Jones v. Woodbury
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Error to the McCracken Circuit. Case. Case 35. Case stated and judgment of the Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
Jones employed Woodbury, a carpenter, to build for him a framed house, the different apartments and dimensions of which were exhibited in a ground plan, and Woodbury agreed to perform the work for the price of $600 or $650, to be paid by the conveyance of a certain lot in the town of Paducah, estimated at the value of $800, the excess to be accounted for in carpenter’s work. This agreement was verbal only. Whether there was or was not a memorandum at the foot of this, ground plan, indicating that the work was to be done in a neat, plain, workmanlike manner, this might be implied as a term of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Kerstetter v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Wheeden v. FiskeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
- Ereño v. Porto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.