Hoffman v. Insurance Company of North America
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
The plaintiffs, an alleged insured and its employee, as distinguished from its alleged liability insurer, are not entitled to a declaration of rights to determine the obligations of the defendants — the alleged insurer, the insurer’s agent and the agent’s liability insurer — in respect to settling, defending, or paying any final judgment in a pending tort action against the alleged insured and its employee, based upon the employee’s collision with a third party while driving his (employee’s) personal automobile, which is contended to have been a temporary substitute automobile…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Residential Developments, Inc. v. Merchants Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Southern Pilot Insurance v. Cecs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- OCCIDENTAL FIRE AND CASUALTY OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GOODMAN Et Al.; GOODMAN Et Al. v. STOVER Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Burruss v. FerdinandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Hoffman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.