Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Insurance Company of North America

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1974No. 48834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiffs, an alleged insured and its employee, as distinguished from its alleged liability insurer, are not entitled to a declaration of rights to determine the obligations of the defendants — the alleged insurer, the insurer’s agent and the agent’s liability insurer — in respect to settling, defending, or paying any final judgment in a pending tort action against the alleged insured and its employee, based upon the employee’s collision with a third party while driving his (employee’s) personal automobile, which is contended to have been a temporary substitute automobile…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Residential Developments, Inc. v. Merchants Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Southern Pilot Insurance v. Cecs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  3. OCCIDENTAL FIRE AND CASUALTY OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GOODMAN Et Al.; GOODMAN Et Al. v. STOVER Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Burruss v. FerdinandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Hoffman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API