Legal Opinion

Becker v. Lamont

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts will sufficiently appear in the following opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Mason, Justice.

This case comes before the court on a motion, made by the defendants, to be relieved from a stipulation signed by both attorneys for the defendants and the plaintiff. The stipulation, undoubtedly has the effect to deprive the defendants, if not of their entire offset, at least of the defence that they are not personally liable upon this contract, and of several other defences set up in the answer.

*24It was decided in the case of Lincoln agt. Crandall and others, (21 Wend. 101,) that a building committee of the “ De Ruyter Liberal Institute," who contracted with the plaintiff to do…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lincoln v. CrandellNew York Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bonds v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Morrill v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Van Nuys v. FitsworthNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bailey v. CoventryNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Welsh v. NoyesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API