Legal Opinion
Ruggier v. Go Mart, Inc.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided June 1, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-03410PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the court are the plaintiffs Motion for Remand [Docket 6] and the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket 8]. These motions, having been fully briefed by the parties, are now ripe for review. As described below, the Motion to Remand [Docket 6] is GRANTED, and the Motion to Dismiss [Docket 8] is DENIED as moot.
I. Background
Duane J. Ruggier II, the plaintiff in this matter, has multiple sclerosis, a disease that has severely limited his mobility, requiring him to use a power wheelchair when traveling in public. (Ex. B,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LAMBETH v. CITY OF HIGH POINTDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024