Legal Opinion
State v. R.H.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 2, 2021No. 119881PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Nos. 119,881 119,885 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. R. H., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A motion to correct an illegal sentence is not a proper vehicle to challenge the constitutionality of a sentence. 2. Issues not adequately briefed are deemed waived or abandoned. Appeal from Sedgwick County District Court; JEFFREY E. GOERING, judge. Opinion filed July 2, 2021. Affirmed. Mark Sevart, of Derby, was on the brief for appellant. Lesley A. Isherwood, assistant district attorney, Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. SalarySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- State v. ReddingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2024