Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ackermann v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1949No. 12610_1Published

1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge

Upon the authority of Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 69 S.Ct. 384, I think the trial court erred in holding that the motion of appellant did not state sufficient grounds to invoke the authority of the court to set aside the judgment, and that the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for a hearing on the merits of appellant’s motion to be relieved from the final judgment of denaturalization against him.-

Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that, on motion and upon such terms as may be just, the court may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Clay v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API