Legal Opinion

Yates v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 2, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

This was an action for damages for illness suffered by the plaintiff as the result of drinking some of the contents of a bottle of coca cola containing a partially decomposed fly or bug and some dirt or "grit,” which bottle of coca cola had been bottled by the defendant company and sold to a lunch wagon, from which plaintiff purchased it.

The action ‘was instituted in a Justice of the Peace Court where judgment for $200 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. From which judgment defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, where the case was tried by the judge without a jury. The judge found in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steinhardt & Co. v. Galveston Cotton Seed Meal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Cooper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Boyd v. Coca Cola Bottling WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Buckingham v. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Merriman v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  3. Winfree v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. Hoback v. Coca Cola Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Wilkes v. Memphis Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API