Legal Opinion

State v. Shultz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 29, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Poweshiek District Court. — Henry Silwold, Judge. Conviction on indictment charging incest. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

1. incest: evidence : good character. I. The serious question in the case arises on the exclusion of testimony on part of witnesses McNalley, Bigler, Byan, Fiser, Walker and Swatchue. The record is substantially alike on all these exclusions. McNalley testified that he knew what the defendant’s, general moral character was in *323the vicinity in which he resided up until the time he was arrested, on January 30, 1915. lie was then asked to state whether it was good or bad, and answer was excluded, on the objection that the defendant was not entitled to “general reputation except as to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Bessette v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. State v. NorthrupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Wilkinson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. State v. KlindtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. Chamberlain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API