Legal Opinion

Martin v. Matthys

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 19, 1986No. 86-53PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiff, Phillip R. Martin, a Homewood police officer, brought this administrative review action after defendants, the board of fire and police commissioners of the village of Homewood, and its members and officers, Francis W. Matthys, William F. Mathieu, and Richard R. Casey, discharged plaintiff on the basis of charges filed by defendant William R Nolan, chief of police, for certain rule violations related to plaintiff’s accepting supplemental employment outside Homewood as a security guard. On administrative review, the trial court found that the relevant rules were lawful and were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. Civil Service CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sutton v. Civil Service CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Nolting v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Epstein v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Launius v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF CITY OF DES PLAINESIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Krecek v. Board of Police Commissioners of La Grange ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Bultas v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Huff v. Rock Island County Sheriff's Merit CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API