Legal Opinion

Rollenhagen v. City of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1981No. Civ. 21511PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HYDE, J. *

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment non obstante veredicto (NOV) and conditional grant of a new trial after a trial by jury where he had recovered verdicts against Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (CBS) and Elizabeth Mazur in a defamation action. Defendant City of Orange had been dismissed by the trial court at the commencement of the trial on a motion by the city for judgment on. the pleadings. A notice of appeal was filed by plaintiff on this judgment but nothing more has been done, and it is not mentioned in plaintiff’s brief. Therefore, that judgment is affirmed.

As to the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Diversified Management, Inc. v. Denver Post, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. George C. Reeves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Roone Arledge, and Everett Erlick v. Joseph O. Giaimo, Counterclaim-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Stevens v. RifkinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  5. Noel v. River Hills Wilsons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API