Legal Opinion
Blikre v. ACandS, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1999No. 980307, 980308, 980309, 980310, 980311PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The defendants in this personal injury litigation, ACandS, Inc., A.H. Bennett Company, Building Sprinkler Company, Inc., and Fargo-Moorhead Insulation Company, were summarily dismissed by the trial court on the ground the time period for suing them had expired under the statute of repose, N.D.C.C. § 28-01-44.1 We hold the statute does not bar an action for injury allegedly caused by exposure, during construction, to a defective product, which is brought against a manufacturer or distributor of the product, even though the defendant installed the *777product as part of an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Yarbro v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bellemare v. Gateway Builders, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lay v. P & G Health Care, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Giest v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. UlmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.