Legal Opinion · Dissent

Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co. v. Spartanburg Bonded Warehouse, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 16, 1929No. 12720Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : A very clear statement of the nature of the controversy and of the proceedings had appears in the opinion of the Chief Justice, which I need not repeat or attempt to improve.

I. The first exception complains of error in submitting to the jury the original notice in the condemnation proceedings upon which was indorsed the verdict of the clerk’s jury.

The notice, the refusal' of the landowner, the order of the judge directing the condemnation issue, the verdict of the jury, the notice of a trial de novo in the Circuit Court; all constituted the record, which informed the Court and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wateree Power Co. v. RionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. United States v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1902
  3. Walker v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Miller v. Parr Shoals Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API