Legal Opinion
In re Albert F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
H. Miller, J.
The issue in this case is whether, under CPL 330.20, the Supreme Court has the authority to extend an order of conditions after its expiration (see CPL 330.20 [1] [o]). We conclude that it does, in agreement with the decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Stone (294 AD2d 59 [2002]).
I
In 1979 Albert F. lured a teenage boy into the basement of his home, restrained him at gunpoint, sodomized him, amputated his genitalia, shot him in the head, and then cannibalized the victim’s sexual organs.
Albert F. pleaded not responsible by reason of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Matter of Oswald N.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of Jill ZZ.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re ZamichowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re Norman D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HallNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- In re Application for an Order to Extend an Order of Conditions Pursuant to CPL 330.20 in Relation to Andrew H., New York County Courts2011
- Santone v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Santone v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012