Farmer v. Lee & Smith Mule Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
1. A provision in a contract for the sale of mules that the seller “does not guarantee the health, soundness, working qualities, recovery from shipping, cold, nor against impotency of” the mules sold and described in the contract, does not relieve the seller of any obligation under an express warranty in the contract as to the age of the mules. Morton v. Tharpe, 41 Ga. App. 788 (3) (154 S. E. 716).
2. A provision in a contract for the sale of mules by which they are described as “about 8 years old” is an express warranty as to the age of the mules. McDew v. Hollingsworth, 19 Ga. App. 166 (3)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beasley, Hallett & Co. v. Huyett & Smith Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Mizell Live Stock Co. v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Morton v. Tharpe & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- McDew v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nichols v. Williams Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Taylor v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- White v. General Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939