Florida Bar v. Rose
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The board of governors of The Florida Bar entered its judgment directing that the respondent, William Lamar Rose, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and requiring that he pay the costs of these proceedings. Respondent seeks review in this Court.
Count I of the first amended complaint of The Florida Bar charged the respondent with violation of Rules 1, 27 and 30, Section II, Rule B, Code of Ethics, adopted by the Supreme Court of Florida on January 27, 1941, 31 F.S.A., in that he failed diligently to prosecute a cause on behalf of his client, thereby causing a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gould v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Folmar v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Smyrna Developers, Inc. v. BornsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. BassSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- The Florida Bar v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. HofferSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Florida Bar v. RolleSupreme Court of Florida · 1995