Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Continental Screen Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1931No. 5938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent moves to dismiss because the return to this court was not made within the time as limited, or lawfully extended. The time fixed by the last extension made by the Board had expired when the record was tendered to the clerk of this court for filing, and thereupon a judge of this court extended such time to and including that day,' and the record was filed. This was fairly within the contemplation of section 4 of rule 35. There is no requirement that the extension must be made Within the limits of the existing extension, as there is in ease of appeals generally, and we see no reason…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Continental Screen Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API