Legal Opinion

Lycoming-Clinton County Mental Health/Mental Retardation Program v. Department of Public Welfare

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Lycoming-Clinton County Mental Health/Mental Retardation Program (the County Agency) petitions for review of the September 28, 2004, order of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision to direct the County Agency to provide mental retardation (MR) services to T.T. We also affirm.

In April 2002, T.T.’s parents filed an application with the County Agency requesting MR services on behalf of their nineteen-year-old son. After reviewing the evaluations of T.T. performed by Richard E. Dowell, Jr., Ph.D., which showed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Norristown Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Arcurio v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allegheny Inspection Service, Inc. v. North Union TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Nancy Hadlock's Family Child Care Home v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. W. Ramer v. Dept. of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API