Legal Opinion

Hill v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1923No. 22PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

This cause is presented as an agreed case under article 2112 of the Revised Statutes. In August, 1919, appellant filed suit against Mr. Hines, Director General of Railroads, for $40,000 damages. Mr. Payne was later substituted as Agent, and on November 18, 1920, the cause was tried in the district court, resulting in a judgment in favor of appellant for $12,500, which was appealed, and which was on June 7, 1922, reversed and remanded.

On March 28, 1921, while the cause was pending in the Court of Civil Appeals, Mr. Payne resigned, and James C. Davis was appointed Agent for the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Dahn v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Conn v. HaganTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. LeCrone v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Davis v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Davis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Davis v. Stamford Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Natoli v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Kilgore v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API