Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Village of Mecosta

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1905No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Debt by Anna Maria Thompson and William M. Thompson, trustees, etc., against the village of Mecosta, upon a municipal bond. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This action, brought to recover upon a municipal bond issued by the village of Mecosta, has been before us on a former occasion. See 127 Mich. 522. The bond was admittedly irregular, and in order that plaintiffs recover it is necessary that they show that the Jackson City Bank, from which they purchased it, was a bona fide purchaser of the bond for value. Id. The evidence offered to prove such purchase consisted of the testimony of Hutchison and a transcript of that of Newkirk, a former' cashier of the bank, now dead, taken upon the former trial. We held in our former opinion that Newkirk’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. McGaffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Durfee v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Thompson v. Village of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Fish v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Durbin v. K-K-M Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. American Insurance v. MartinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Detroit National Bank v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Johnston v. New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. King v. F. B. Todd & Sons, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API