Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison v. Pearson
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 23, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carol H. Arber, J.
The relief sought by way of these applications (no less than 125 of them are presented for signature each week) appears innocuous at first glance. The plaintiff ostensibly seeks a prejudgment remedy to protect its property, to wit, the meters which are installed in the premises and which serve as a basis for billing. They are made to seem innocuous in part because they are done on form papers in which certain blanks have been filled in and certain others are paragraphs that are stricken or included to suit the circumstances. The innocuous appearance of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Church of St. CeciliaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. HaymerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1988