UnionBank v. Thrall
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gilleran Johnson
This mortgage foreclosure case gave rise to a dispute between two banks, plaintiff UnionBank (Union) and defendant Eureka Savings Bank (Eureka), regarding which bank’s loans had priority. The trial court held that Union had priority, and Eureka appeals. We reverse and remand.
The facts are largely undisputed. The mortgagor, Tracy Thrall, owned several parcels of residential real estate including one in Sandwich, Illinois, and one in Somonauk, Illinois. Thrall borrowed money from both Eureka and Union at various times and secured these loans with separate mortgages on the properties, as follows:
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Aames Capital Corp. v. Interstate Bank of Oak ForestAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Bill Marek's Competitive Edge, Inc. v. Mickelson Group Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Campbell v. TrotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. ZarkhinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. ZarkhinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. CACH, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Cach, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Robinson v. North Pond Hunting ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.