Legal Opinion

Dorchester Music Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 20, 1959No. Civ. 571-57-PH to 574-57-PHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

After due deliberation, this Court makes the following Findings of Fact:

A. Concerning the creation, exploitation and dissemination of Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ Compositions, the Court finds:

1. Sometime in the Spring of 1953, Ben Blue, the entertainer and pantomimist, commissioned one, Ruth Freed, to compose an original musical composition to be used by Mr. Blue to accompany or “back-up” his pantomime act.

2. The commissioned composition was written shortly thereafter in Beverly Hills, California, with music by Fred Spielman; lyrics by Ruth Freed and Buddy Kaye were added…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leo Feist, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Loew's Incorporated v. Columbia Broadcasting SystemDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  3. Widenski v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  2. Champion Map Corporation v. Twin Printing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1971
  3. Nordstrom v. Radio Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1965
  4. Duchess Music Corporation v. SternDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1971
  5. CASS COUNTY MUSIC COMPANY v. IGL Racquet Club, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API