King v. Cassidy
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Travis. Tried below before tlie Hon. J. P. Richardson. The opinion discloses the character of this case, and states the material facts.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
Thomas Cassidy in his lifetime appears to have been the owner of the north half of lot 4, and the south half of lot 5, in block 70, in the city of Austin, as well as lots 1 and 2 in block 7, in Fort Smith, Arkansas; and on the 1st day of December, 1856, under an arrangement with John King, an agreement which is set out in the record appears to have been entered into between the parties, but is signed only by King, and reads as follows:
“ This memorandum witnessetli: That whereas I, John “ King, of the city of Fort Smith, in the State of Arkansas, “ have become the assignee of Francis Dieterich…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dwight v. OvertonTexas Supreme Court · 1872
- Walling v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SweeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- McLane v. PaschalTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- The People v. MaggioIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Wells v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Anderson v. First National Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.