Legal Opinion
Merriam v. Wimpfheimer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The first two causes of action stated in the complaint have been settled and, therefore, I have only to consider the third.
I hold that the third alleged cause of action as against Otto D. Wimpfheimer and. Sol Wimpfheimer and Thorner Manufacturing Company, Inc., must be dismissed, without costs.
I have already dismissed the complaint as to E. W. Bliss Buildings, Inc., without, costs.
I. My subject matter jurisdiction is-based on the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, Section 70e, 11 U.S.C.A. § 110(e), which gives-to a trustee in bankruptcy the right to recover by suit property…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Feist v. DruckermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Varnum v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Oxford Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dellefield v. Blockdel Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942