Legal Opinion

HSBC Bank, USA v. SSSR, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Francesca E. Connolly, J.

The plaintiff moves to amend the caption to include the State of New York as a defendant, and for leave to amend the complaint adding a cause of action seeking to reform the mortgage.

Factual and Procedural History

The salient procedural history of this foreclosure action is as follows: In November 2000, the defendant SSSR, Inc., doing business as Pride Cleaners, obtained a United States Small Business Administration loan in the amount of $225,000. The named lender in the loan documents is “Business Loan Center, Inc.” The loan was secured by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. HSBC Bank USA v. PhilistinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Fandy Corp. v. Lung-Fong ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Amaranth v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API