Legal Opinion

Higginson v. Higginson

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for a separation under section 1762 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Action for a separation under section 1762 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The parties were married April-9, 1913, in the borough of Brooklyn, where they resided at the commencement of the action.The defendant appears specially for theo purpose of contesting the jurisdiction of the court. Alleging that he is consul for the republic of Peru in the city of New *458York, he moves on that.ground alone to vacate the service of the summons and to dismiss the complaint, because this court is without jurisdiction. Whether federal courts have original jurisdiction, exclusively of state courts of civil…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Börs v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Davis v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  5. United States v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1826

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Popovici v. PopoviciDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
  2. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1964
  3. Urdaneta v. UrdanetaNew York Family Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API