Legal Opinion

Godawa v. Stanislawski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. Docket No. 35Published

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiffs held real estate as contract purchasers. Defendant Mary Stanislawski was the vendor. We omit reference to other defendants. Plaintiffs got behind in payments. The vendor brought summary proceedings for possession (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 13240). At the time fixed, May 8,1922, for hearing before the circuit court commissioner, neither the purchasers nor their counsel appeared. Complainant had judgment. After time for appeal had expired, and about June 27, 1922 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 13252), the purchasers moved in the circuit court that they be authorized to bring dilatory appeal (3…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Miller v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Cleveland Iron Mining Co. v. HusbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Valley City Desk Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Huddleston v. Charles Amos & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API